Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Homework: read into Baseline Expectations!

Attendees: Casper Dreef, Chris Philips, Nicole Harris, Steve Glover, Jean-Pierre Aerts, Maarten Kremers, Kevin Hickey, Alex Stuart, Pål Axelsson, Daniel Muscat, Dean Flanders, Alan Buxey, Davide Vaghetti, Peter Gietz, Meshna Koren, Martin Stanislav, Albert Wu, Stephen Lovell

Agenda:

  1. Background
  2. Define the work items and work plan of this WG as described in WG Charter eduGAIN Futures Working Group Charter
  3. Elect the Chair(s)
  4. AOB

Notes:

1. Background

Only 1 major revision since the start of eduGAIN. Governance and profiles. Baseline expectations in REFEDS.
Davide: Is eduGAIN a marketplace for metadata or a infrastucture? In case of the later, the bar should be raised.
Terry: What is the value proposition of eduGAIN? How do we promote eduGAIN.
What impact do commercial parties have on eduGAIN?

Chris: Technology, OpenID Connect in particular, is obviously missing on the agenda.

The group agreed that technology should be on the agenda,

Meshna: It is important to sustain the community. For an SP it's becoming increasingly difficult to see the benefits, due to technological difficulties. Making eduGAIN more relevant and interesting for SPs. A long-term strategy is needed.

...

Dean: Critical for open science is to get group membership for organisations.

Peter: New development: eduID.

Davide: Changes need to be sustainable. We can't cover it all, so we need to stick with the fundamentals. Currently eduGAIN - by design -  doesn't have the capacity to manage a single entity. Do we want to change this?

2. Define work items

...

Chris: Goals. What's the product of this group? Recommondations to the eSG?
Nicole: Yes, a set of recommendations to be sent out to eduGAIN in the wider sense (eSG, OT, Secretariat, etc).
Davide: Try to capture the view of all stakeholders. At the moment we don't have big research infrastuctures.

...

Alex: Should this be a short term working group?
Nicole: Time frame suggestion. Recommendations done by May. Outcomes to be discussed during TNC and REFEDS meetings. 
Dean: Add a seventh item about the future technical vision.
Nicole: Current work items form under Goal 1. Technical recommendations could fall under Goal 2.
Dean: Concept of FaaS should be able to support a broader set of technologies (SAML, OIDC, etc.).
Chris: eSG is more a general assembly. This group could be a companion of the OT. Long running. Get work done faster. (Goal 3)
Pål: Work item 8. Possible formation of long term group or team.

3. Elect the Chair

Call for chair

4. AOB

Homework: read into Baseline Expectations!