...

• European Learning Model https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/european-commission-empl/European-Learning-Model/blob/master/rdf/ap/edc/documentation/EDC-generic-no-cv.html#evidence
• Extensive (extremely overly complicated) model to define all kinds of learning: over 480 properties to capture and validate all types of learning
• Based on
  • JSON-LD
  • Verifiable Credentials: https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/

OpenBadges-2.0

• https://www.imsglobal.org/sites/default/files/Badges/OBv2p0Final
• json-ld specification: https://openbadgespec.org/v2/context.json
• Less complex than ELM
• Focussed on learning, attesting an achievement
• Signed (is it a JWT?)
• Typical quote:
  • "The Assertion issuer is authorized to award Assertions of the declared BadgeClass (typically by being the issuer of the BadgeClass.)"

  • "Additional checks may ensure that:  The issuer Profile awarding the Assertion is trusted to have declared accurate information about its identity (typically via Endorsement)."

  • => freely translated by Marcus: "We do not have a trust model yet"

Trust Modelling

• Nice read: https://medium.com/@leifj/trust-does-not-scale-94bab5b67f5c
• eduGAIN
• EBSI
• OID-Fed
• ToIP
  • Apparently not more than a whitepaper
    • Intermediaries (as in Federated Identities) are bad: "Trust Gap" from scaling up
    • Intermediaries (as in DI) are good
• New concept: Holder Binding