...
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
---|---|---|---|
Licensing for online/digital/e-resources - institution in one country have a license, but does that mean that it can be used by students at other campuses? Interoperability issues e.g. IPv6 and other technological mismatches between home and receiving campus. Access and identity issues. International relations - national NRENs are sovereign and regional networks provide connectivity - what engagement is there locally that could support the local environment; being a responsible local partner as well as national | People working in NRENs do not know the establishments (or people) in other countries - need to get the right information from NRENs; the sending NRENs should provide critical and accurate information (something that SIG-TNE could facilitate) For small establishments the administrative overhead can be huge, collaboration can save time and money Political/tech barriers in different countries - i.e. government restrictions in China (e.g. IPv6 and firewall). In-country knowledge is key Identity management and authorisation issues. To be authorised the user in some cases needs to be physically in the country. eduGAIN needs to be explored. Language/culture/working practice differences across both countries/institutions Sharing best practice on TNE
| Knowing who is out there –we know there is an increasing demand, but which institutions we need to serve? Who has the demand for a remote campus? (e.g. Georgia) Political barriers in different countries - institutes from abroad might not be allowed to settle in a country (e.g. Hungary) Connection policies differ, some countries do not allow connecting institutions that are not financed by the government, overseas institutions are classed as ‘private’ e.g. Spain Networks built for research purposes and not educational institutions (e.g. Africa) Language/culture/working practice differences across both countries/institutions | Licensing for online/digital/e-resources - institution in one country have a license, but does that mean that it can be used by students at other campuses? Needs negotiation, expertise, time, effort. Political/tech barriers in different countries - i.e. government restrictions in China (e.g. IPv6, Google and firewall). In-country knowledge is key Institutions might not have the right peering policies and use commercial connections (which may be less stable) Communications - time zone differences, language barriers - additional time is needed for international work Sending hardware equipment across to different countries can be expensive and incur delays e.g. customs Defining relationships between the home and overseas campus/partnership is essential, for example accountabilities, roles and responsibilities, and any hierarchies in the relationship |
Wrap up and next steps
Two main issues - data collection and licensing
GÉANT and Jisc currently support :
- The group discussions identified some synergies, and the main issues identified were:
- Overseas licensing
- In country data/MI
- Internal communications and relationships, culture, language
- Interoperability
- Connection policies
- Resources
- Logistics for transporting hardware abroad
- Quality of international connectivity and high costs in some countries
This has been a starting point to tease out the important issues, and reassuringly there is nothing that has raised concerns outside the known challenges. The next discussion as the SIG-TNE will prioritise the activities, whilst being realistic about what we can achieve
It is helpful to identify some of the things that are currently being worked on through GÉANT and Jisc:
- Developing interactive global connectivity map for TNE, bringing together information such as regulatory frameworks and policies, country specific informationDeveloping interactive global connectivity map
- Jisc TNE toolkit for education institutions
- Case studies
- Developing online registration form (collecting info from home institutions)
- Support for overseas licensing
...