...
Contractual Date: | 30-06-2017 |
Actual Date: | First release: 09-11-2018 Recently updated: 04-06-2020 – new engaged schools, new eduroam locations. |
Grant Agreement No.: | 732049 – Up2U |
Work Package: | WP3 |
Task Item: | Task 3.1 |
Nature of Deliverable: | R (Report) |
Dissemination Level: | PU (Public) |
Lead Partner: | PSNC |
Authors: | Tomasz Kuczyński (PSNC), Michał Zimniewicz (PSNC), Krzysztof Kurowski (PSNC), Bogdan Ludwiczak (PSNC), Dariusz Stachecki (PSNC), Dawid Szejnfeld (PSNC), Ilias Hatzakis (GRNET), Peter Szegedi (GÉANT) |
...
Having started in Europe, eduroam has gained momentum throughout the research and education community and is now available in 90 territories worldwide (https://www.eduroam.org/where/).
...
In a nutshell, eduroam allows students, researchers and staff from participating institutions to obtain Internet connectivity across campus and when visiting other participating institutions by simply opening their laptop.
...
Country | Schools with eduroam | Reported problems | |
Austria | 0 | No template for ICT equipment in schools NREN has no capacity to make a change | |
Croatia | ca. 50% out of 2729 connected by NREN | ||
Czech Republic | 20 out of 98 connected by NREN |
| |
France | 0 | BYOD is banned by law at schools | |
Greece | 0 |
| |
Hungary | 1700 out of 6677 connected by NREN | ||
Italy | 13 out of 738 connected by NREN |
| |
Ireland | 0 | No template for ICT equipment in schools Issues with implementation of identity providers for students | |
Lithuania | NREN supports eduroam at schools | Content filtering policy | |
Netherlands | NREN supports eduroam at schools |
| |
Poland | 0 | Content filtering policy | |
Portugal | 0 | ||
Romania | NREN supports eduroam at schools | ||
Serbia | 60 out of 1700 connected by NREN |
| |
Slovenia | 100 out of 755 connected by NREN | No incentives for schools and NREN Funding issues Various network access policies regarding students | |
Sweden | NREN supports eduroam at schools | Issues with implementation of identity providers for students | |
UK | 0 |
The leaders with regard to promoting and implementing eduroam at high schools are Croatia and Hungary, in which more than one thousand schools provide eduroam networks. The two countries also reported that implementations were possible because of funding received for building or renewing IT infrastructure at schools.
...
The current version of this deliverable includes all 68 170 schools that have been engaged in the project’s activities from six seven out of eight countries. No schools are yet known from Germany and Portugal. The schools are all Some of the schools were already reported in Deliverable Deliverables D7.1 and Deliverable. , D7.2. Please note that some schools appear in both the deliverables, and some appear in just one of them (see Section 3.2 of Deliverable D7.2 for information on the evolution of the lists of pilot schools). In this analysis, all such identified schools are considered., and D7.3.
Since network availability is the key Since network availability is the key to the always-on education concept, neither formal nor informal learning scenarios would benefit from the limitation of eduroam access to particular location types such as campuses, museums, libraries, labs or public places. Thus students and teachers should have the capability to use eduroam wherever it is available. This analysis therefore provides information on all available locations near the schools.
Analysis has shown that availability of eduroam in the neighbourhood of the pilot schools is very high. In 43% 40% of cases, it is possible to find eduroam access within walking distance from the school (less than 1 km). Most of the pilot schools (68%62%) are located less than 5 km from the closest eduroam location.
The average number of eduroam locations available within 20 km from a pilot school varies from country to country and can reach up to 7563.14 59 locations.
Therefore, the objective of the project seems to be feasible, i.e. not to deploy eduroam at new locations, but to study the current availability of eduroam and to investigate solutions that enable students to get access to the network at existing locations, that can then be covered by the formal and informal learning scenarios.
...
The pilot schools, as well as eduroam availability in their neighbourhood, are depicted in the interactive map below (click the map). Please note that it is focused on the currently known pilot schools only, as more general information on all eduroam locations is already publicly accessible.
...
The data by country is presented in the following sections.
...
Number of pilot schools: 11
Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 25 24.6473
Table: Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroam locationsof eduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 1.00 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 8.82 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 7.5500 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 87.2791 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
...
Number of pilot schools: 10
Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 50.6070
Table: Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroam locationseduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 3.10 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 15.60 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 20.00 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 1112.9000 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
...
1.4.2.3 Italy
Number of pilot schools: 19 41
Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 19 21.79 85
Table: Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroam locationseduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 01.1605 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 25.1688 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 6.5871 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 108.8922 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
Distance | Number of pilot schools |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 210 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 35 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 48 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 47 |
More than 20 km | 611 |
1.4.2.4 Lithuania
Number of pilot schools: 7 71
Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 75 46.14 97
Table: Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroam locationseduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 113.1444 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 4719.4361 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 16.2973 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 07.2920 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
Distance | Number of pilot schools |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 531 |
Between 1 and 5 km1 | 15 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 05 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 07 |
More than 20 km | 113 |
1.4.2.5 Poland
Number of pilot schools: 22
Average number of eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 63.59
Table: Average number of eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 6.82 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 44.18 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 10.91 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 1.68 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
Distance | Number of pilot schools |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 12 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 4 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 0 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 0 |
More than 20 km | 6 |
1.4.2.6 Portugal
Number of pilot schools: 18 8
Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 64 21.44 13
Table: Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroam locationseduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 70.3988 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 466.9438 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 812.3338 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 1.7850 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
Distance | Number of pilot schools |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 113 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 34 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 01 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 0 |
More than 20 km | 4 |
1.4.2.
...
7 Spain
Number of pilot schools: 3 7
Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within distance of 20 km from the pilot school: 1 5.00 86
Table: Average number of eduroam locations eduroams within given distance from the pilot school.
Distance from the school | Average number of eduroam locationseduroams |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 0.0014 |
Between 1 and 5 km | 0.3357 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 0.6786 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 04.0029 |
Table: Number of pilot schools within given distance from any eduroam access.
Distance | Number of pilot schools |
---|---|
Less than 1 km | 01 |
Between 1 and 5 km1 | 0 |
Between 5 and 10 km | 20 |
Between 10 and 20 km | 1 |
More than 20 km | 05 |
2. Overview of Internet Connectivity at Pilot Schools
...
GÉANT Multi-Domain Virtual Private Network (MD-VPN) is designed to increase privacy and control over data transfers. MD-VPN enables end computers to collaborate via a common private network infrastructure. It offers fast setups of new VPNs to clients and so can be used in a variety of ways, from a long-term infrastructure with a high demand for intensive network usage to quick point-to-point connections for a conference demonstration.
GÉANT L3-VPN provides a VPN in which each party can have an allocated bandwidth from 155 Mbps to 100 Gbps, according to its own requirements. This service allocates unique virtual local area network identifiers to each L3-VPN to ensure data isolation across GÉANT IP, giving not only assured performance but also security of the transferred data.
...
The idea of a Content Delivery Network (CDN) is to distribute services spatially relative to end users to provide high availability and high performance. A CDN is a geographically distributed network of proxy servers. Its main goal is to deliver content more quickly and more reliably.
Image source: www.cdnreviews.com
One of the possible implementations is based on a geo-located Domain Name System (DNS) service that responds to a user’s domain lookup query indicating the IP address of the proxy (edge) server that is the “nearest” for the user. Then, the user communicates with the edge server and, if the edge server has the desired content (cache), no transfer to and from the original server is needed. Otherwise, the edge server first fetches the content from the original server, and the first user requesting this particular piece of data waits for the response a little bit longer.
...
It could be beneficial to build a CDN that handles users’ requests for content from content repositories. Accessing large multimedia objects physically located in one country by a user in another country far away will result in the drawbacks outlined above, for instance, longer download times, larger latencies, greater network load, and increased possibility of service downtime. Consider the case that 20 students from Portugal are running the same video, physically located in a content repository in Greece, during a class. The large video file must be transferred through the backbone network 20 times – the same data is sent across Europe 20 times and all 20 users have to wait for the transfer. If there was a CDN with an edge server in Portugal, then the content would be sent once from Greece to Portugal, it would be cached at the edge server, and 19 of the students would be served more quickly with the cached copy. Note that the benefits scale with the number of students, classrooms and pilot schools – without a CDN, all requests for such a video would be handled by a small content provider’s server from the other end of Europe. The overall technical architecture of the eduOER and CDN integration is presented in the Figure below.
We are currently investigating a prototype CDN with edge servers located in London, Poznan and Athens. The preliminary tests confirm that the physical locations of a client and a server strongly influence the data transfer times and, as a result, the network load too. More tests will be conducted with the first content repositories federated with eduOER. We will also analyse how to implement the CDN to ensure it is easy to add new edge servers and new repositories in the future.
...
The point-to-point network services (GÉANT Plus and GÉANT Lambda) cannot support communication paths between end users and the ecosystem services, and also between two end users (e.g. for WebRTC tutoring sessions), because of the multiplicity of the end points and because the set of end points taking part in communication will dynamically change. However, the point-to-point network services can be applied for static connections between some end points that host the ecosystem, and are physically distributed among different locations. Such end points could be an end-user service hosted in one physical location and its required back-end service hosted in another location, if they exchange large amounts of data. For instance, if we provided an LMS service from the infrastructure in Poland and a sync and storage service, being a back-end for the LMS, from the infrastructure in Switzerland, and assuming they sent heavy content between each other, then it would be beneficial to support the communication between these services with GÉANT Plus (or GÉANT Lambda, depending on particular bandwidth needs or predictions).
A communication that we can definitely improve is end users’ access to static data. Most of the static data we deal with in the project can be found in content repositories of multimedia objects. As shown in the previous section, this is where a CDN can be successfully implemented, and the effectiveness of the CDN can be improved by the underlying network.
...