This is the place for T7 participants to express their contribution interests. Please indicate one or more work items and distinguish your prio.
The split in work items is inspired by the ToIP-Model:
Source: https://trustoverip.org/toip-model/
| Work Item | Content hints | Volunteer 1st prio | Volunteer 2nd prio and reviewer | item-specific call #1 | Status RELEASED REVIEW DRAFT NOT STARTED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 - DI Whitepaper | Positioning paper of the GÉANT community towards the emerging DI ecosystem | DRAFT | |||
| 02 - Ecosystem Use Cases | Ecosystem Use Cases as per ToIP Layer 4 / Technology Stack | 5.2.2024 10-11h | REVIEW planned 5.6.24 | ||
| 03 - Ecosystem Governance | Ecosystem Governance as per ToIP Layer 4 / Governance Stack | Mohácsi János | Christoph Graf | REVIEW planned 5.6.24 | |
| 04 - Credential flow | Credential/Identity information exchange as per ToIP Layer 3 / Technology Stack | Marcus Hardt | 5.2.2024 11-12h, 21.6.2024 11h-12h | DRAFT | |
| 05 - Credential governance | Credential/Identity information governance as per ToIP Layer 3 / Governance Stack | 5.2.2024 9-10h | REVIEW | ||
| 06 - Wallets and protocols | Wallets and Issuer/verifier/Wallet communication protocols, focus on technical aspects as per ToIP Layer 2 / Technology Stack | DRAFT | |||
| 07 - Wallet and protocol governance | wallet and communication protocol governance as per ToIP Layer 2 / Governance Stack | 8.2.2024 9h30-10h30 | DRAFT | ||
| 08 - interworking architecture | interworking architecture between the emerging "ID ecosystem" and the existing "global identity interfederation", focus on technical aspects as per ToIP Layer 1 / Technology Stack | Wolfgang Pempe | NOT STARTED | ||
| 09 - interworking governance | "ID ecosystem" and "global identity interfederation" interworking governance aspects as per ToIP Layer 1 / Governance Stack | Esther Ruiz Ben | NOT STARTED |
Timing
The 01 - DI Whitepaper should conclude in Q1 of 2024, the other items are more relaxed.
Guidelines
Please check 01 - DI Whitepaper for underlying assumptions
Proposal for structuring the contribution in subchapters (if applicable in your specific case):
| Subchapter | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| The work item | a brief description of the topic at hand, map it to "our world". You may get inspiration from the corresponging ToIP description. | |
| Transformative aspects | What will potentially change with respect to our current way of delivering value in general? And what will change with a particular view to our ecosystem? Include a critical review of our existing ecosystem services and the nature of potential impact on them. | |
| Opportunities | Describe use cases in our ecosystem that could potentially benefit from an emerging DI ecosystem Describe assumptions / requirements towards other players / outcomes etc. to make it deliver value to our ecosystem Describe actions we need to fulfil as a community (ecosystem) to get such value delivered to our ecosystem Might this make it easier for NRENs to participate in the ecosystem with less effort? | |
| Risks | Describe potential situations or actions of other important stakeholders leading to a failure to deliver value to our ecosystem This could be linked to external developments but also to our inability to fulfil above actions or to get consensus in our own ecosystem | |
| Engagements | Describe (crowdsourced within our group) prior or ongoing activities in our ecosystem relevant to the topic at hand by NRENs and GÉANT |