...
Initial discussion mailing list: self-assessment-tool@lists.ewti.euInitial discussion notesnotes during EWTI2015: http://etherpad.ewti.eu:9001/p/g.bIyUOSNaD6Z1zFWX$selfassessmenttool
Draft requirements specification (please comment!): Google doc
Summary
Tool Use Cases
- LoA assessment for IdPs
- Sirtfi compliance for IdPs and SPs
- SP Assurance level ("inverse" of IdP LoA assessment)
...
- Responsibility for the tool should be at a federation level. This does not preclude running the tool centrally. This will aid scalability
- The tool should send assessment requests to organisations based on contact information in metadata
- The tool should support multiple question types, yes/no and multiple choice
- Machine readable responses (yes/no/multiple choice) should be supported by secondary, evidence-based free text
- The tool should facilitate peer review; peer assignment should not be determined by the assessee
- Results of assessments should be made available; individual assessee results would be private to the assessee but an agregated view should be freely available
- Fed Ops should have access to all results of the assessments within their federation
- Access control for an assessment should facilitate private and public sharing
- The tool should support re-assessment and have configurable behaviour in the event that the re-assessment is not done or if it fails
...
