e-Researcher-Centric Policies - develop the policy framework for communities, providing recommendations for baseline “policy profiles” for users, communities and identity providers, and, through such harmonisation, will reduce the “policy silos” that hinder interoperation. The policy profiles will be defined in close interaction with European and global stakeholders, specifically the e-infrastructures and research infrastructures, so that in the AAI ecosystem every participant is able to rely on well-defined predictable behaviour by the other participants in the infrastructure.
Inventory of high-assurance identity requirements from the AARC2 use cases
This document and the associated Wiki page provide an inventory of currently identified use-cases where there is a requirement that the identity of a user accessing data or using a system or an instrument is assured with higher confidence than provided by an identification consistent with the REFEDS Assurance Framework “Cappuccino” assurance profile.
Identified use-cases come from the life sciences domain, driven by legal restrictions on the processing of human personal data. Assurance requirements include the use of multi-factor authenticators and improved “freshness” of the user’s affiliation.
- Milestone Document AARC2-MNA3.5 (submitted Jan 2018) referencing wiki page with requirements identified from use-cases. Futher requirments may be added if identified during the project.
Table of Contents
An overview of the work on researcher-centric policies is now available in the project deliverable "Recommendations for e-Researcher-Centric Policies and Assurance" (DNA3.4).
...
Acceptable Use Policy Development
AUP Alignment Study
Security for Collaborating Infrastructures Trust Framework says: "Each infrastructure has the following: ... An Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) addressing at least the following areas: defined acceptable and non-acceptable use, user registration, protection and use of authentication and authorisation credentials, data protection and privacy, disclaimers, liability and sanctions" (SCI Version 2 section 6). The AARC2 AUP alignment study aims to draft a common minimum, or 'baseline', AUP text to satisfy these requirements thereby facilitating rapid community infrastructure ‘bootstrap’, easing the trust of users across an infrastructure and providing a consistent and more understandable enrolment for users as users move between communities and project. More information can be found at the links below.
Baseline AUP and the implementers guide
The WISE Information Security for E-infrastructures (WISE) community SCI working group has hosted the work on the baseline AUP, with the intent of this baseline becoming a globally accepted set of points that facilitate the research workflows.
AARC2 NA3 team working text, including active comments and version history, is stored here. (Please see the stored Version History for the recent evolution of this text.)
Baseline AUP study input
...
- Google spreadsheet of AUP comparison (01/04/2018) with summary table -
| View file | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Baseline AUP presentations and other materials
- Presentation of AUP alignment work in progress at the WISE security group meeting in Abingdon, UK 27/2/2018
- Presentation of AUP alignment work at AARC2 third project meeting in Athens, Greece 10-13/4/2018
and 43rd EUGridPMA meeting in Karlsruhe, Germany 23-26/5/2018 with additional material - Presentation of AUP alignment work at EOSC-hub/AARC2/EGI/EUDAT/WLCG Joint Security Policy Workshop at CERN, Switzerland 18-20/7/2018
- Presentation of AUP alignment work given by Dave Kelsey at the WISE session at the 2018 NSF Cybersecurity Summit in Alexandria, VA, USA 21/8/2018
- Presentation of AUP alignment work at the 44th EUGridPMA meeting in Toulouse, France 26/09/2018
- Resulting AUP document (v1.2) after discussions at the EOSC-hub/AARC2/2018
- Draft summary table of AUP comparison 12/03/2018
...
- EGI/EUDAT/WLCG Joint Security Policy Workshop at Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany, 14-16/11/2018
- Discussions at the AARC2 Fourth Meeting at Reti, Busto Arsizio, Italy, 19-22/11/2018 resulted in the drafting of AARC-I044 Implementers Guide to the WISE Baseline Acceptable Use Policy (preliminary) formatted document here.
- Discussion of adoption and sustainability of AUP and other AARC outputs at 45th EUGridPMA meeting at CERN, Switzerland 21-23/01/2019
Resulting draft WISE AUP document (v1.3) after discussions at the EOSC-hub/AARC2/EGI/EUDAT/WLCG Joint Security Policy Workshop in Abingdon, UK 19-21/02/2019
...
Identity Assurance for collaborative use cases
Inventory of high-assurance identity requirements from the AARC2 use cases
This document and the associated Wiki page provide an inventory of currently identified use-cases where there is a requirement that the identity of a user accessing data or using a system or an instrument is assured with higher confidence than provided by an identification consistent with the REFEDS Assurance Framework “Cappuccino” assurance profile.
Identified use-cases come from the life sciences domain, driven by legal restrictions on the processing of human personal data. Assurance requirements include the use of multi-factor authenticators and improved “freshness” of the user’s affiliation.
Milestone Document AARC2-MNA3.5 (submitted Jan 2018) referencing wiki page with requirements identified from use-cases. Futher requirments may be added if identified during the project.
...
Assurance Frameworks
The e-Researcher task also contributes to the Assurance Framework activities in REFEDS (the REFEDS Assurance Framework RAF), the RAF Piloting activities, and the inter-infrastructure exchange of assurance profiles
http://refeds.org/assurance (REFEDS Assurance Framework)
Exchange of specific assurance information between Infrastructures (G021)
Expression of REFEDS RAF assurance components for identities derived from social media accounts (G041)
- Assurance framework comparison diagram (Assurance Spaghetti)
...
Federated Identity Management for Research (FIM4R)
The AARC project has identified FIM4R as the primary mechanism for Community Engagement, and decided to support the reinvigoration of the group by supporting the showcasing of cross-domain demonstrators (the AARC pilots), by promoting its meetings in both Europe and globally, and by encouraging all communities to review and assess the original requirements and chart the way for the future FIM developments for research and collaboration.
We refer to the FIM4R web site and the FIM4R White Paper version 2 for further information.