Potential damage
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Very high
Decisions:
- Accept: acknowledge the risk, but do not take any action before it hits
- Mitigate: take measures to reduce the probability of occurrence or the potential damage
- Avoid: do something else without this risk, e.g. nothing
- Transfer: let someone else take care of it, e.g. insurance
- (Deny the risk: not allowed to choose, but many managers do this nevertheless...)
Probability of occurrence | Potential damage | Decision | Reasons | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial | 1 | GAFAM |
|
|
| Financially it is not possible to compete with GAFAM Mitigate→ find approach against GAFAM in strategic category |
2 | Competing technology |
|
|
| ||
3 | Marketing |
|
|
| Mitigate→
| |
4 | Funding |
|
|
| participating in projects and present ourself and requirements and capabilities | |
5 | Environmental cost |
|
|
| not selecting environmental consuming technology like some types of ledgers | |
Legal | 6 | Governments Rules |
|
|
|
|
7 | International Compatibility (ex. GDPR) |
|
|
| same as above plus finding common denominator solutions | |
8 | Misusing of DID |
|
|
| Refer to existing solution like revoking ID | |
Strategic | 7 | Dependency | ||||
8 | Intermediaries | |||||
9 | Acceptance | |||||
10 | Engagement (Governance Rules) | |||||
11 | Usability | |||||
12 | Interoperability (Standards and Protocols) | |||||
13 | Integration | |||||
14 | Communication (Marketing) | |||||
Security | 15 | Physical vulnerabilities (Device lost) | ||||
16 | Protecting sensitive data |
- Consensus
many times in a year | ||||
once in 1 years | ||||
once in 2 years | e.g. Physical vulnerabilities (Device lost) | |||
once in 5 years | ||||
once in 10 years | ||||
percentage of occurrence Probability / Potential damage | Low | Medium | High | Very High |
- No-consensus-pile
.....