Date
Attendees
Apologies
Goals
- Check how we are progressing with the EC Deliverable
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min | Communications | Davide: will move to OIDCfed task end of this month. Will be less involved with eduKEEP |
| 5 min | BCP | Current opinion most important bits missing? Constantin and Karl have wrote a very clear piece about the GDPR implications for eduKEEP. In the deliverable, this will be made into a summary, directing you to an appendix with the specific implications. Rolf had to adept the architecture: now we rather not say we are provisioning user data as a whole to services. We do have attribute access through the back-channel. The back-channel has to be added and clarified in the document again. Davide: Rolf and I should be working on the diagrams. We can make a legend for the types of connections and make them unified in how we use them throughout the document. Mihaly: you don't have to make a legend. Just write it directly on the line. It is simpler that way. Davide: technology section is still a little slim. Mihaly will write a few paragraphs to say that we will be using existing technology. Hervé: do we have to cover in the architecture everything that is mentioned in the table, to help the reader? Davide: Two ways: we can give a list of features that are used in comparative analysis, or an introduction in the comparative analysis. The second one is the more elegant solution. |
Action items
- Davide Vaghetti and Rolf Brugger will work on the diagrams
- Hervé BOURGAULT will write an introduction for the comparative analysis
- user-fc935 will expand the technology section a little bit