Time and Place
12:00 - 14:00 CET. Amsterdam Board Room or task-force-SIG room on Lifesize: https://call.lifesizecloud.com/call/2573142.
Attendees
- Klaas Wierenga
- Nicole Harris
- Annabel Grant
- Licia Florio
- Peter Szegedi
- Brook Schofield
- Sigita Jurkynaite
- David West
- Helga Spitaler
Aims
- To look at some of the challenges we face serving communities outside the core GÉANT membership.
- To look at solutions that we have in place.
- To see if we can identify any solutions / partnerships / approaches in the short, medium and long term.
Agenda
Time | Item | Notes |
---|---|---|
12:00 - 12:10 | Arrive, get connected, fix the camera etc. | |
12:10 - 12:30 | Quick round table - where are we running projects that serve communities outside the core membership | |
12:30 - 13:00 | What challenges do we face? (see table below) | |
13:00 - 14:00 | What solutions exist now / might be possible in the future? |
Current Challenges
Issue (I've filled in some examples - feel free to add more before the meeting) | Current Solution | Future Ideas |
---|---|---|
Not able to charge for events in many countries as we are not VAT registered. Impacts TRANSITS, TNC and expanding training opportunities. | Only run training in certain countries. | |
The 80 / 20 rule is now pretty well understood in the company and a necessary requirement to support procurement processes for our members, but we don't necessarily understand the priorities for the 20%. | Ad hoc - rely on being told if new ideas are not eligible. | |
According to the latest Dutch Tax Authority (DTA) ruling, GLIF is considered an independent organization that is not a separate legal entity (no VAT registration) but has a governance independent from GÉANT. It has two practical implications:
Same for REFEDS. | There is a GLIF branded Sponsorship Agreement for those EU sponsors who need it. CESNET and PSNC presumably loose their VAT (reverse-charged but cannot be reimbursed due to lack of EU VAT number provided by GLIF) GLIF Sponsors all together loose the 21% Dutch VAT that GLIF pays to GÉANT for the Secretariat service. I have no idea how particular US organizations can sponsor GLIF without a W8 BEN E form? | We all know that the DTA ruling in fundamentally wrong. Something that Bert negotiated in the past. GLIF should be positioned as project, and not as an independent organization. GÉANT must challenge the current DTA ruling about GLIF. There was a promise from finance that we'll consult with EY on this. TBC? |
GLIF Secretariat is a service provided by GÉANT following an outsourcing model to a third-party company. There is involvement from all three parties in here:
Information flow and transparency among these parties is problematic. | Plenty of emails back and forth, lots of delays in invoicing and collecting payments. | |
When IR members get an inquiry from partners outside Europe regarding GÉANT services, what is the process internally to ensure effective follow-up | ad hoc; | a clearer process would be good |
Unclear status Volunteer Agreements for providing community services - e.g. are they now 'mandated' for GEANT projects where volunteer trainers are used, are the boilerplates now usable, are they accepted by volunteers etc? | They were being introduced when I needed volunteers in Nov 2017 and were not yet fit for purpose. I hear there were issues with reimbursements of other volunteers recently.... | Volunteer agreements that are mutually acceptable for GÉANT project auditing and volunteers, or DIY permitted to continue by projects |
Not clear which parts of GÉANT's Service Portfolio are available to non-Member communities | ad hoc exploration | Produce a non-Member community GÉANT product portfolio |
Unclear if/under what conditions non-Members outside of the EU are allowed to become Members of GÉANT | ?? | Clearer GÉANT membership policy and guidelines |
Can external people attend EC project events (and can we feed them). |